Enter your Email

Preview | Powered by FeedBlitz
My Photo
Blog powered by Typepad

« Gaskill v. Robbins | Main | Alabama, Georgia, Missouri and Oklahoma Family Law Blogs Added To Blog Roll »

February 06, 2007


Listening to a paid agenda activist like Richert is much like deciding whether to quit smoking based on commercials paid for by the cigarette companies - unreliable, laden with bias and forgetful of the role played in the first place.

To the best of my recollection, Richart was an early "keep it all hidden" advocate.

Bottom line is that if one of the non-governmental parties wants it open, it needs to be open. Plus, courts have got to stop handing out unconstitutional, first amendment squelching gag orders to aggrieved litigants.

State agents screw up and are unaccountable, and our systems foster this. How better to expose it than by the press? It isn't as if any significant relief will come from judicial review or judicial discipline.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Become a Fan

What Others Are Saying About This Blog